„Eine Definition unterscheidet sich von einem Syllogismus darin, daß der Definierende nicht die Existenz des Definiendums beweist […], weil eine Definition lediglich angibt, was ein Ding ist, nicht jedoch, daß es ist.“ (p. 288) #Eco #Definition #Syllogismus
2012693
{2012693:X3AAKHH3}
1
theologie-und-philosophie
50
default
12110
https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22X3AAKHH3%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Eco%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%221985%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BEco%2C%20Umberto%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BH%26%23xF6%3Brner%2C%20Hufe%2C%20Solen.%20einige%20Hypothesen%20zu%20drei%20Abduktionstypen%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%2C%20in%3A%20%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BUmberto%20Eco%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%5C%2F%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BThomas%20A.%20Sebeok%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%20%28Hgg.%29%2C%20Der%20Zirkel%20oder%20Im%20Zeichen%20der%20Drei.%20Dupin%2C%20Holmes%2C%20Peirce.%20M%26%23xFC%3Bnchen%3A%20Wilhelm%20Fink%20Verlag%201985%2C%20288%26%23x2013%3B320.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22bookSection%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22H%5Cu00f6rner%2C%20Hufe%2C%20Solen.%20einige%20Hypothesen%20zu%20drei%20Abduktionstypen%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Umberto%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Eco%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Umberto%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Eco%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Thomas%20A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Sebeok%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22bookTitle%22%3A%22Der%20Zirkel%20oder%20Im%20Zeichen%20der%20Drei.%20Dupin%2C%20Holmes%2C%20Peirce%22%2C%22date%22%3A%221985%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2296IMF5ZE%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222015-12-09T14%3A28%3A55Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Eco, Umberto, Hörner, Hufe, Solen. einige Hypothesen zu drei Abduktionstypen, in: Umberto Eco/Thomas A. Sebeok (Hgg.), Der Zirkel oder Im Zeichen der Drei. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1985, 288–320.