Serres: Die Definition der Philosophie

Zitat

Veröffentlicht am von

„Die Definition der Philosophie ist, die Synthese aller derzeitigen Erkenntnis zu vollziehen und die zukünftige Erkenntnis vorwegzunehmen und zu erfinden. Das ist die philosophische Konstruktion“ (p. 145) #Serres #Rötzer #Philosophie #Erkenntnis #Konstruktion

2012693 {2012693:C3AU2NTZ} 1 theologie-und-philosophie 50 default 14180 https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22C3AU2NTZ%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Serres%20and%20R%5Cu00f6tzer%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%221986%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BSerres%2C%20Michel%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%5C%2F%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BR%26%23xF6%3Btzer%2C%20Florian%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BGespr%26%23xE4%3Bch%20zwischen%20Florian%20R%26%23xF6%3Btzer%20und%20Michel%20Serres%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%20%28%26%23xFC%3Bbersetzt%20von%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BChristine%20Pries%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%29%2C%20in%3A%20Franz%26%23xF6%3Bsische%20Philosophen%20im%20Gespr%26%23xE4%3Bch.%20Baudrillard%2C%20Castoriadis%2C%20Derrida%2C%20Lyotard%2C%20Serres%2C%20Raulet%2C%20Levinas%2C%20Virilio.%20M%26%23xFC%3Bnchen%3A%20Klaus%20Boer%20Verlag%201986%2C%20131%26%23x2013%3B145.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22bookSection%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Gespr%5Cu00e4ch%20zwischen%20Florian%20R%5Cu00f6tzer%20und%20Michel%20Serres%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Michel%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Serres%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Florian%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22R%5Cu00f6tzer%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22bookAuthor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Florian%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22R%5Cu00f6tzer%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22translator%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Christine%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pries%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22bookTitle%22%3A%22Franz%5Cu00f6sische%20Philosophen%20im%20Gespr%5Cu00e4ch.%20Baudrillard%2C%20Castoriadis%2C%20Derrida%2C%20Lyotard%2C%20Serres%2C%20Raulet%2C%20Levinas%2C%20Virilio%22%2C%22date%22%3A%221986%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%223-924963-21-5%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22DE%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2246B8WJHW%22%2C%226GYK5RZ2%22%2C%2296IMF5ZE%22%2C%22NW4V3W2D%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-10-14T10%3A11%3A20Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Serres, Michel/Rötzer, Florian, Gespräch zwischen Florian Rötzer und Michel Serres (übersetzt von Christine Pries), in: Französische Philosophen im Gespräch. Baudrillard, Castoriadis, Derrida, Lyotard, Serres, Raulet, Levinas, Virilio. München: Klaus Boer Verlag 1986, 131–145.

Vuillemin: The Excluded Middle

Zitat

Veröffentlicht am von

„Epicurus rejects the truth, and therefore the necessity, of the disjunction itself. What Epicurus denies is therefore not the determinate character of the truth-values of the disjunction’s components, but the truth of that very disjunction. His criticism is directed not to the principle of bivalence but to the principle of the excluded middle. Naturally, a challenge to this latter is a challenge to the former, for then the excluded middle is neither true nor false.“ (p. 170) #Vuillemin #Epicurus #truth #ExcludedMiddle

2012693 {2012693:YZCIVMT9} 1 theologie-und-philosophie 50 default 14177 https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22YZCIVMT9%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Vuillemin%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%221999%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BVuillemin%2C%20Jules%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BNecessity%20or%20Contingency.%20The%20Master%20Argument%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B.%20Stanford%3A%20CSLI%20Publications%20%26lt%3Bsup%26gt%3B5%26lt%3B%5C%2Fsup%26gt%3B1999.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22book%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Necessity%20or%20Contingency.%20The%20Master%20Argument%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jules%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Vuillemin%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%221%22%2C%22date%22%3A%221999%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22EN%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2246B8WJHW%22%2C%2296IMF5ZE%22%2C%229ZBNH8TA%22%2C%22NW4V3W2D%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-11-05T15%3A50%3A39Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Vuillemin, Jules, Necessity or Contingency. The Master Argument. Stanford: CSLI Publications 51999.

Rancière: L’Université française de 1973

Zitat

Veröffentlicht am von

„Regardez autour de vous : sur ce point, l’Université française de 1973 est aussi pacifiée que la société soviétique de 1936. Point de lieu où l’on ne proclame la mort de l’homme et la liquidation du sujet: au nom de Marx ou de Freud, de Nietzsche ou de Heidegger, de «procès sans sujet» ou de la «déconstruction de la métaphysique», grands et petits mandarins vont partout, traquant «le sujet» et l’expulsant de la science avec autant d’ardeur qu’en mettait la tante Betsy, dans David Copperfield, à chasser les ânes de son gazon. La seule lutte entre nos philosophes universitaires porte sur ceci : à quelle sauce mangerons-nous «le sujet»? Quant à l’homme, il n’est pas aujourd’hui un hypokhâgneux qui ne rougirait de l’invoquer dans ses dissertations. Les seuls qui osent encore en parler, sans plus de précautions, sont de fait les travailleurs.“ (p. 152) #Rancière #LeSujet

2012693 {2012693:JPMWY3XX} 1 theologie-und-philosophie 50 default 14169 https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22JPMWY3XX%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Ranci%5Cu00e8re%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222011%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BRanci%26%23xE8%3Bre%2C%20Jacques%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BLa%20le%26%23xE7%3Bon%20d%26%23x2019%3BAlthusser%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B.%20Paris%3A%20La%20Fabrique%20%26%23xC9%3Bditions%202011.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22book%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22La%20le%5Cu00e7on%20d%27Althusser%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jacques%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Ranci%5Cu00e8re%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222011%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%228MK5SE3B%22%2C%2296IMF5ZE%22%2C%22DTG8V2ER%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-10-19T09%3A44%3A29Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Rancière, Jacques, La leçon d’Althusser. Paris: La Fabrique Éditions 2011.

Bloch: Freude und Glück

Zitat

Veröffentlicht am von

„Die Freude ist der Adel des Glücks, an ihr kann nichts mehr den Rang des glücklichen Lebens streitig machen.“ (p. 1100) #Bloch #Freude #Glück

2012693 {2012693:L25ECI9Z} 1 theologie-und-philosophie 50 default 14159 https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22L25ECI9Z%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Bloch%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%221976%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BBloch%2C%20Ernst%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BDas%20Prinzip%20Hoffnung%2C%203%20Bde%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B.%20Frankfurt%20a.M.%3A%20Suhrkamp%20%26lt%3Bsup%26gt%3B3%26lt%3B%5C%2Fsup%26gt%3B1976.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22book%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Das%20Prinzip%20Hoffnung%2C%203%20Bde%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Ernst%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bloch%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%221976%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2296IMF5ZE%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-10-19T08%3A21%3A09Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Bloch, Ernst, Das Prinzip Hoffnung, 3 Bde. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 31976.

Adorno: Der Begriff der Universalgeschichte

Zitat

Veröffentlicht am von

„Der Begriff der Universalgeschichte, von dessen Gültigkeit die Hegeische Philosophie ähnlich inspiriert ist wie die Kantische von der der mathematischen Naturwissenschaften, wurde desto proble­matischer, je mehr die vereinheitlichte Welt einem Gesamtprozeß sich annäherte.“ (p. 311) #Adorno #Universalgeschichte #Hegel #Kant

2012693 {2012693:IDVQNU2J} 1 theologie-und-philosophie 50 default 14123 https://philosophy-at-work.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22IDVQNU2J%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2012693%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Adorno%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%221966%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bspan%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfont-variant%3Asmall-caps%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BAdorno%2C%20Theodor%20W.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fspan%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BNegative%20Dialektik%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B.%20Frankfurt%20a.M.%3A%20Suhrkamp%201966.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22book%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Negative%20Dialektik%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Theodor%20W.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Adorno%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%221966%22%2C%22originalDate%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPublisher%22%3A%22%22%2C%22originalPlace%22%3A%22%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2296IMF5ZE%22%2C%22VBRBLP9C%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-11-20T11%3A55%3A51Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Adorno, Theodor W., Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 1966.